Topics

Latest

AI

Amazon

Article image

Image Credits:Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch

Apps

Biotech & Health

mood

Women in AI Urvashi Aneja

Image Credits:Bryce Durbin/TechCrunch

Cloud Computing

Department of Commerce

Crypto

go-ahead

EVs

Fintech

Fundraising

Gadgets

punt

Google

Government & Policy

Hardware

Instagram

layoff

Media & Entertainment

Meta

Microsoft

Privacy

Robotics

security department

Social

Space

Startups

TikTok

transfer

Venture

More from TechCrunch

Events

Startup Battlefield

StrictlyVC

Podcasts

Videos

Partner Content

TechCrunch Brand Studio

Crunchboard

get through Us

To giveAI - focused womenacademics and others their well - deserved — and delinquent — clock time in the spotlight , TechCrunch is launch aseries of interviewsfocusing on singular women who ’ve contributed to the AI revolution . We ’ll publish several piece of music throughout the year as the AI boom continues , highlight central piece of work that often goes unrecognised . Read more profileshere .

Urvashi Aneja is the establish director of Digital Futures Lab , an interdisciplinary research effort that seek to analyse the fundamental interaction between technology and society in the Global South . She ’s also an associate fellow at the Asia Pacific program at Chatham House , an independent policy institute based in London .

Aneja ’s current inquiry focalise on the societal impact of algorithmic decisiveness - make systems in India , where she ’s based , and platform governance . Aneja recently author a study on the current uses of AI in India , reviewing use cases across sectors including policing and agriculture .

Q&A

Briefly , how did you get your start in AI ? What attracted you to the playing area ?

I pop out my calling in inquiry and insurance employment in the humanitarian sector . For several years , I meditate the purpose of digital engineering science in protracted crises in low - resourcefulness contexts . I quickly learned that there ’s a fine line between innovation and experiment , particularly when dealing with vulnerable populations . The learnings from this experience made me deeply implicated about the techno - solutionist tale around the potential of digital technologies , peculiarly AI . At the same clip , India had launched itsDigital Indiamission andNational Strategy for Artificial Intelligence . I was bother by the dominant narratives that saw AI as a silver bullet for India ’s complex socio - economic problems , and the complete lack of critical discourse around the issue .

What work are you most majestic of ( in the AI theatre of operations ) ?

I ’m proud that we ’ve been able-bodied to draw attention to the political thriftiness of AI production as well as blanket implication for societal justice , labor relations and environmental sustainability . Very often story on AI nidus on the gains of specific applications , and at best , the benefits and risks of that app . But this misses the forest for the trees — a product - oriented lens obscures the broad structural encroachment such as the contribution of AI to epistemic injustice , deskilling of travail and the protraction of unexplainable power in the majority earthly concern . I ’m also proud that we ’ve been able-bodied to render these care into concrete policy and regulation — whether designing procurance guidelines for AI use in the public sector or delivering evidence in legal proceedings against Big Tech company in the Global South .

Join us at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI

How do you navigate the challenges of the male - dominated technical school industriousness , and , by extension , the male person - dominate AI diligence ?

By letting my work do the talk . And by constantly ask : why ?

What advice would you give to women seeking to enter the AI playing area ?

get your cognition and expertness . Make certain your technical understanding of issue is sound , but do n’t focus narrowly only on AI . Instead , study widely so that you may draw connections across fields and disciplines . Not enough people understand AI as a socio - technical system that ’s a product of history and polish .

What are some of the most pressing issue facing AI as it evolves ?

I think the most pressing issue is the engrossment of power within a handful of technology companies . While not new , this problem is exacerbated by unexampled development in large spoken communication models and generative AI . Many of these companies are now fanning fears around the existential risk of infection of AI . Not only is this a distraction from the subsist harms , but it also lay these companies as necessary for addressing AI - have-to doe with harm . In many way , we ’re losing some of the momentum of the “ tech - whip ” that arose keep an eye on the Cambridge Analytica sequence . In places like India , I also worry that AI is being pose as necessary for socioeconomic growth , present an opportunity to leapfrog persistent challenges . Not only does this exaggerate AI ’s potential drop , but it also disregard the point that it is n’t potential to leapfrog the institutional growing take to produce safeguard . Another military issue that we ’re not consider seriously enough is the environmental impacts of AI — the current trajectory is likely to be unsustainable . In the current ecosystem , those most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change are improbable to be the beneficiary of AI innovation .

What are some issues AI user should be aware of ?

substance abuser need to be made mindful that AI is n’t magic , nor anything tight to human intelligence . It ’s a mannequin of computational statistics that has many good use , but is at long last only a probabilistic guess found on historic or previous patterns . I ’m sure there are several other issues user also require to be aware of , but I need to monish that we should be leery of attempts to lurch responsibility downstream , onto exploiter . I see this most of late with the role of productive AI tools in gloomy - imagination context of use in the majority world — rather than be cautious about these experimental and treacherous technologies , the focus often shift to how end - users , such as farmers or front - line health worker , want to up - skill .

What is the best way to responsibly build up AI ?

This must start with evaluate the need for AI in the first place . Is there a trouble that AI can uniquely puzzle out or are other mean value possible ? And if we ’re to build up AI , is a complex , black - box model necessary , or might a simple-minded logic - based model do just as well ? We also take to re - center domain cognition into the building of AI . In the fixation with self-aggrandizing data point , we ’ve sacrificed possibility — we need to progress a theory of variety based on arena cognition and this should be the basis of the models we ’re building , not just with child datum alone . This is of course in addition to key issues such as involvement , inclusive teams , labour rights and so on .

How can investor best push for responsible for AI ?

Investors take to study the total biography round of AI output — not just the outputs or resultant of AI applications . This would command looking at a image of subject such as whether labor is somewhat valued , the environmental impacts , the business example of the company ( i.e. is it ground on commercial surveillance ? ) and internal answerability measure within the ship’s company . investor also need to ask for estimable and more rigorous evidence about the supposed benefits of AI .