But as I meet on in that article , whether the Mac App Store is well or sorry on equaliser — for usersordevelopers — and whether it turns out to be hugely successful or a proportional failure will depend on quite a few factors . Perhaps the biggest business concern right now relate tothe developer guideline for relegate software system , as well as restrictions the computer storage places upon developers when it comes to many of the stock drill imply in break and selling software program . Here ’s a look at what we know so far .

Curated? Or constrained?

Perhaps the heavy issue parent by the initial Mac App Store review road map , for both users and developer , is that many popular exist Mac programs — include many , many Mac gem — would be flat - out barred from appearing in the store . Here are some of the thing that are prohibited by the guidelines , along with examples of popular types of software that would violate these restrictions :

Of of course , there are also the subjective bans on capacity similar to those for the iOS App Store : libelous , offensive , and mean - enlivened content ; realistic epitome of fury ; encouraging pulmonary tuberculosis of alcoholic drink or illegal substances ; “ excessively objectionable or unrefined content ” ; porn ; and the like . And there are a identification number of other rules , technological in nature and not , that are undefined enough so as to give Apple wide latitude to disdain almost anything .

The grownup question I ’m left with , after reading the Mac App Store ’s guidelines for entry is , “ What ’s left ? ” I ’m of grade being a bit bantering here , but the fact remains that if I go through my Applications folder — and especially if I range various folders inside /Library and ~/Library — there are a whole lotta programs , including many of my favorites , that would likely be reject from the Mac App Store .

Article image

iOS App Store developer concerns, magnified

Beyond the question of app toleration are issues about how deal through the Mac App Store will restrain the way developers can do business . As noted inour clause on developer chemical reaction to the Mac App Store announcement , there are a number of concerns we ’ve hear about theiOSApp Store that loom even tumid in a storage designed for sellingMacsoftware :

No trial / demo versions . : This is a big unfavorable judgment of the iOS App Store , but it ’s sufferable when you ’re let the cat out of the bag about software that sells for a few dollar bill or less ( and many iOS developers deal with it by release detached “ lite ” versions of their apps ) . When it comes toMacsoftware , the typical price is probable to be $ 10 , $ 30 , or more . Asdeveloper Jonathan Rentzsch note , developer will detest not being able to give users a estimable smell at their computer software , and users will surely baulk at not being able to try the full version of a programme before purchase it . And “ lite ” versions are less appealing on the Mac side , as they ’re unremarkably just that — light on features . When spend $ 50 or more on a piece of Mac software , you want to be able-bodied to try out all the feature before plunking down the hard currency .

No make up upgrade : Just as with the iOS App Store , developers must sell a major young variation of their package at a single price — they ca n’t offer a reduced price for the great unwashed who purchased earlier versions . They ’re thus forced to make a hard decision : If they charge full cost for the fresh version , they put on the line alienating loyal users , who feel as if they ’re being take advantage of , but if they blame a lower price , they ’re leave money on the table because many novel customers likely would have pay off the full damage .

Apple ’s stinger : Apple consume 30 percent of each sale . You might say , “ So what — that ’s exactly the same system as on the iOS App Store . ” But the Io App Store is a completely different food market , and one in which there was n’t already a booming , successful software market before the store opened . Thereissuch a market for Mac software , and there has been for decades . For all the reason I mention in my previous clause , that market is at fourth dimension fragmented and , especially for new users , problematical to navigate , but it ’s there , and it ’s possible for third - party developer to make a living selling their software directly to customers using online - hosting and payment - processing services that cost far less than 30 percent of each sale .

No direct human relationship with customers : Developers do n’t know who ’s buy their software package and , thus , ca n’t contact them directly . likewise , the App Store is in many mode a wall between the developer and the user . Again , this is how the iOS App Store work , but it ’s now how the Mac market forge . For starters , there ’s the issue of living . Technical issues are more complex on a Mac than on an iPhone , iPad , or iPod , and often want a more hands - on approach to support , yet the App Store mannikin does n’t further — indeed , to some extent it gets in the way of — this form of lineal user financial backing . In improver , usually when you buy or register software , the developer gains your electronic mail address and can thus reach you directly if a major issue move up — for exercise , to rent you know that a major hemipteran that feign data has been discovered and what you should do until an update is usable . With the App Store model , the developer ’s only option is to secrete that update as before long as possible and hope users do n’t recede data in the meantime . Similarly , many developers will occasionally mail an email to existing customers letting them recognise about novel product . That ’s not potential for customers who purchased via the Mac App Store .

Not knowing if an app will be rejected : Perhaps the fully grown concern for developer of the Io App Store is that there ’s no guarantee that , after spending calendar month and many resource develop an app , Apple will approve your app — even if you conform to every road map , Apple can freeze off it on even a conceptual basis . And that reality does n’t seem to have change in any meaningful elbow room for the Mac App Store — for model , there ’s no “ pre - approval process ” through which you may get the OK that your broadcast is conceptually satisfactory . This uncertainty has driven a act of establish developers away from the iOS App Store , so I would n’t doubt if it alienate more than a few from the Mac App Store , as well .

It’s a beta

Now , it ’s important to signal out that the guidelines float around right now are the 1.0 reading — or perhaps not even that . It ’s possible — nay , likely — that Apple will pluck the guideline before the Mac App Store opens . And if the phylogeny of theiOSApp Store ’s guideline is any indication , we should expect to see a good number of revisions over clock time , as well . ( Indeed , the document itself even states , “ It is a live document that will evolve as we are submit with novel apps and situations , and we ’ll update it periodically to reflect these modification . ” )

And I go for that ’s the case , because the overarching theme above , it seems to me , is that the Mac marketplace is very dissimilar from the iOS market , but Apple is — at least so far — take aim to utilise the iOS App Store framework , minimally changed , for the Mac App Store . And I do n’t jazz how realistic that really is .

It ’s also notable that , unlike with iOS , Apple has made it clear that the Mac App Store wo n’t be the only direction to get Mac software — you’ll keep on to be capable get computer software , just as you always have , directly from developers . I ’ve get wind a secure amount of business organization that this is just a first step , and that eventually Apple will curb all Mac software package distribution to the Mac App Store , but there are a good number of intellect , unequalled to the Mac market and not present in the iOS marketplace , why I do n’t think that will happen . ( For exemplar , developer Rafe Colburnpoints out that such a move would kill a major securities industry for Mac sales . )

give that , why the concern over how Apple handles the Mac App Store ? Ca n’t developers just choose whether or not to go through the computer storage ? Of course . But the hazard here — and make no mistake , it ’s a risk of exposure for both developer and users because of the wallop it will have on software diversity — is that if the Mac App Store becomes pop enough , users may eventually look , mistakenly or not , that it ’s the only place they can get ( or at least need to get ) Mac computer software . If the App Store becomes the de facto method acting for getting fresh programs , we could stop up in a situation where developer feel force to write software system that meet Mac App Store guidelines . And if that happens , and if those rule of thumb do n’t transfer dramatically , we ’ll all lose .

Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard)