I love it when Apple steal from itself . First of all , it just establish sentience . Its designs are usually jolly good .
Just call for Samsung ( pizzazz ) .
secondly , it gives its intersection a sense of coherence and often a horse sense of account . Pick up the Apple TV remote and you’re able to see the original iPod Shuffle . Not all the design homages are so easygoing to make out . Apple ’s recently updated Macs made me consider about how the company wish to recycle not just materials from its products but the way they look .
With the iMac, Apple is the only company that has made an all-in-one desktop computer that is not just successful, but also iconic.
Mac throwbacks
TheiMacis essentially an updated version of the classic Mac : an all - in - one design for the average substance abuser . The cause the classical Mac form factor had substantial depth was mostly to accommodate a CRT . Indeed , the first iMacs take on a narrowing shape because the CRT was the main constraint as the other components got smaller but the blind got openhanded . Still , the shape of the authoritative Mac and the current iMac is basically a screen set in the upper part of a rectangle . It ’s not complicated , but Apple has been one of the few companies to make an all - in - one mannequin agent for decennary that is a real banger of a reckoner in both performance and aesthetics . Say what you want to about the tiresome shape of these iMacs , at least they total in actual colors , just like the original iMacs did .
With the iMac , Apple is the only company that has made an all - in - one desktop computer that is not just successful , but also iconic .
metalworks
With the iMac, Apple is the only company that has made an all-in-one desktop computer that is not just successful, but also iconic.
Apple also updated theMac mini , make the mini - est miniskirt ever . These 2024 Mac miniskirt were rumour to look more like an Apple TV , but it really look more like a diminutive Mac Studio , which is more what it is . The Mac mini has always owed a bit of itsinspiration to the much - loved , oft - drag through the mud G4 Cubeand the 2024 iteration makes the homage even more pronounced . in person , I consider Apple could turn it up a notch and throw in some clear credit card , but Apple may be loathe to do this because plastic do n’t experience as premium and do n’t weather as well as dark materials ( although I ’ve seen some graphite Mac miniskirt that have beat to hell ) .
So , while I enjoy the reference , Apple ’s current plan ethic is still rather minimalist , maybe too staid . Across the board , Apple ’s products miss the horse sense of whimsey present in some of its older offerings .
One rumored gimmick that might vary that is themysterious wise domicile accessory that is expected to have a screenor an limb like the iMac G4 . If Apple does ship a WALL - atomic number 99 trend gadget that observe you around the kitchen , I think there are some other canny ways it can recycle , recycle , and reinvigorate its product batting order .
The iPod had a great design. Surely, the company can figure out a way to revive it somehow in a new product.
Not-so-crazy Apple product ideas
Apple has hinted that it might be getting more into the domicile mechanization field of operation . For years one standard after another has promised to make everything in your home work seamlessly together and that has n’t happen yet . It ’s high time Apple did for home mechanisation what it did for wireless earpiece : just make its own devices that work better . And while it ’s doing that , would it bolt down it to do it with a jiffy ? This is why I ’m turning to you today to ask you to signal my online petition asking Apple to make a thermoregulator that looks like a classic iPod . desire the heat to go up ? clip the wheel clockwise . Want it to go down ? Back the other way . Buttons around the flange can set the other functions . No need to put a 5 GB spinning hard drive in it .
The iPod had a neat aim . Surely , the company can figure out a way to revive it somehow in a novel ware .
allot to Apple lore , Steve Jobs was not a sports fan of the Newton but he wish the look of the eMate . The iBook was then based on the eMate design , making it more broken than previous Apple laptops and experience a handle . An iPad in a rugged form factor with a dedicated keyboard might just be a good opportunity for a third political party , but if Apple ever does transport a speck - screenland Mac , some of that erstwhile eMate / iBook legerdemain might dulcorate the mickle . Who does n’t love a handle ?
in conclusion , rent ’s turn to the iPod nano . No other equipment in Apple ’s history start through as many change as the nano . The nano was Apple ’s playground , going from a diminutive classic iPod chassis to squarish , back to upright , then to just a square touch screen and finally an iPhone - alike coming into court . Apple has – sadly , in my view – allow modest phones by the wayside , patently deciding the turn of building block ship was n’t deserving the exploit .
But what if it made a smaller phone that was the weird phone ? It ’s arduous to mess up with winner and it ’s even harder to confirm odd screen size , but envisage if Apple had a line of iPhones that experimented with dissimilar material , possibly put Touch ID in the power button , it could even prove an e - ink CRT screen , give it crazy battery spirit . Imagine if it had a line it could have playfulness with . It did that with the nano , it could do it again .
I love it when Apple copy itself . I wish it would copy itself more .
