As the cavalcade of M4 Macs rained down upon us last workweek , it became absolved that Apple has establish a solid rhythm for updates to its processor line . So far , it ’s been four old age and we ’ve learn four generation of Apple silicon chips , each more telling than the last . In everything from computational and graphic capableness to power efficiency , the era of Apple - made processors has test to be a earth change for the company .
But even such an astounding success comes with challenges . As Apple has increasingly carved out its own family in the PC market place , the company has left behind many of its classic competitors . It ’s rarely compare to old rival like Dell or HP ; even its biggest opposite number , such as Meta and Google , do n’t worry about the same categories .
In Sojourner Truth , Apple has been leave with just one real competition — the one company it can never quite outsmart .
The M1 MacBook Air is four years old but for most of its users, it still provides the performance that’s needed.
Itself .
Time is marching on
Like the filaree on which they reckon , the improvement of Apple ’s mainframe has been a perpetual rataplan . Every year ’s chip cores see gains of roughly 20 percentage over the previous generation ; wait a few year , and you ’ll see improvements of 60 to 80 percent over the old generation . Then level on top improvements in graphic cores , computer memory bandwidth , and so on .
But despite that seemingly inexorable marchland , the real impressive part of the Apple silicon earned run average is the degree to which Old simulation continue relevant . I have both an M2 Pro Mac miniskirt and a MacBook Air with an M1 chip – the first model that the company announced when they made the conversion back in 2020 . And what affect me is that the M1 feels just as capable today as it did four years ago .
That ’s not a given in technology . muckle of people keep their computers for long times – my mother ’s 2011 iMac says a very dull hello – but oftentimes that ’s even as they adjust to the fact that those computing gadget just are n’t as tight . But that just has n’t yet proved true in the Apple silicon earned run average ; even those base - level buffalo chip still find just o.k. . That ’s quite the effort in an era where even a four - year - old iPhone can start feeling like its ripe for replacement .
The M1 MacBook Air is four years old but for most of its users, it still provides the performance that’s needed.
Apple has chip at out an telling amount of clearance , making each chip faster than the next , to the pointedness that base - stratum chips can surpass older in high spirits - storey processors . I recentlyreviewed the M4 Mac miniand find that the M4 outpace my M2 Pro mini from just last year on more than a few job .
The M1 MacBook Air is four years old but for most of its user , it still render the functioning that ’s need .
metalworks
The Mac mini had its first redesign in 14 years.
A circumstances of that is a will to Apple ’s engineering , of class . But it ’s also somewhat due to the Mac ’s long history , and the fact that the tasks people are doing with them have n’t changed as radically in the last several year as in prior decades or with other devices . ( What you may do with iPhone now versus ten year ago is a much bigger swing than with the Mac , for representative . )
That ’s with child for users because it mean the hardware they buy is relevant for longer . And it ’s mostly great for Apple because it ’s a good selling point : corrupt this Mac and you ’ll have it for five perhaps even ten years .
But it also has downsides .
Hitting for the upgrade cycle
For Apple , increasing the longevity of its Macs means a longer upgrade bicycle — more time before Apple can sell you another Mac . That ’s not great for a company trying to gouge up Mac sales , of course . One might argue that it fall under the heading of “ effective problems to have ” but in a financial society that seems to prioritise growth above all , it ’s not idealistic . ( Whether that ’s a fairish expectation , well , that ’s a different and much longer treatise . )
Increasing the length of service of its Macs means a longer upgrade cycle . That ’s not great for a company trying to rack up Mac sales .
Still , there are always people who have long eschewed buy an Apple calculator – the much - vaunted “ switchers”–and there are , candidly , always newfangled people , stop . Both of those provide a solid base for increment , even if they do n’t provide the stiff beat of farseeing - time Mac user upgrading .
But as the Mac continues to move forward , it start to feel a little less like one want to be on the cutting edge , and more like every yr brings something a little more predictable . Or perhaps even , defy I say , boring ? That ’s sure as shooting not an mental image one want to cultivate . So how to upend it ?
Year over year
Apple pass more than a decennary trying to make a car , a project it at long last shut down when it became clear it was n’t conk to happen . But there are still elements of that project the party could ( and should ) take off , and not all of them are about the strictly technology side of things .
cable car companies , after all , are the received holder of predictable updates . example get vamp regularly , year over year , and mostly do n’t convert too much . There are longer and long times between the upgrade cycles for many buyers . And the ultimate human body of a car – four wheels , warehousing , guidance rack – has largely gone unchanged for decades . And yet car companies stay in business .
The Mac mini had its first redesign in 14 years .
What can Apple learn from them ? Well , when in doubt , modify the promotion . We ’ve long encounter the supercycle of iPhone purchases where a change in case design spur a purchasing spike – that may not be as apparent in the Mac , given the broader production line fragmentation of update timing over the last many class – but it ’s hard to believe it ’s restrict to smartphones .
see the new Mac miniskirt , for example . It ’s the first redesign the screen background has seen in 14 years , and if that does n’t leave a bump in the Cartesian product ’s sales , I ’d be surprised . render color to the iMac contrast with the Apple silicon transition is another good example . These kind of changes , trivial though they may seem , can still make a big difference when it get along to consumers .
It ’s a short firmly to figure these alteration for laptop , to be fair ; Apple seems to have settled on its platonic ideal of a notebook computer data processor . But the revamping of the groundwork example MacBook Pro point another angle : Apple added a Thunderbolt larboard to the other side of the computer , a nicety that can make a handsome divergence for people ’s everyday utilization . Just like the front - mounted ports on the Mac mini and Mac Studio , it show that Apple is thinking abouthowits customers use its Cartesian product . And there ’s no adept means of ensuring loyalty than making it clear that you ’re serving your customers ’ needs .
Apple Mac mini (M4, 2024)
Apple Mac mini (M4 Pro, 2024)
Apple 14-inch MacBook Pro (M4, 2024)
Apple 14-inch MacBook Pro (M4 Pro, 2024)
Apple 14-inch MacBook Pro (M4 Max, 2024)
Apple 16-inch MacBook Pro (M4 Pro, 2024)
Apple 16-inch MacBook Pro (M4 Max, 2024)
Apple iMac (M4, 2024)
