Live Science Verdict
We were not expecting to be as impressed with the OM-1 Mark II as we were . It has impressive dedicated astro lineament to extinguish one of the giving problems astrophotographers contend with , accurate and dependable autofocus with good subject catching modes and blisteringly dissipated burst charge per unit . There are a lot of matter that make it just as good as a pot of the full - frame models we ’ve try out .
Insane 120FPS burst rate
hot Composite fashion fantastic for star topology trail
The dial on the front is now rubberized to aid grip.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Starry Sky AF is honest and telling
Surprisingly well images for 20.4 Megapixels
Accurate autofocus
Most of the buttons on the top half are fine, but the ones at the bottom are more flush to the camera and quite hard to press.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
20.4 Megapixels may be underwhelming for some substance abuser
Not enough of an upgrade if you already own the OM-1
Noisy low - ignitor images
I liked that the drive and focus modes each had their own button.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Button design and layout could be improved
Why you may trust Live ScienceOur expert reviewer drop hr examination and comparing production and service so you may choose the better ones for you . Find out more about how we examine .
Sensor:20.4MP 4/3 - column inch Stacked BSI Live CMOS sensorEVF resolution:5,760 K dotsMonitor:3 - inch vari - angle LCD touchscreen , 1,620 K dotsImage stabilisation : Up to 8.5 stopsAutofocus detecting range:-8 - 19 EVISO ambit : ISO 80 - 102,400 ( upper default ISO 256,00)Minimum shutter speed:60 secondsBurst rate : Up to 120FPSRAW buffer:213 chassis / 120FPSVideo:4 K 60FPS , Unlimited transcription timeBattery life:520 shotsStorage:2 card slot — Mount Rushmore State Memory Card ( SDHC , SDXC , UHS - I , UHS - II compatible)Dimensions:5.46 x 3.61 x 2.86 - inches /138.8 x 91.6 x 72.7mmWeight:599 g ( including barrage fire and retentivity scorecard )
Even with a large lens, the weight feels evenly distributed — although how long you can hold it for depends on how many hours you’ve put in at the gym.
OM System ( formerly Olympus ) have made a self-aggrandizing assertion with their OM-1 agate line of cameras . With a lot of its specs rivaling the big hitters like the Canon EOS R5 , Nikon Z8 and Sony Alpha kitchen stove , the OM-1 Mark II is a flagship camera that says : " You should give attention to me . "
Micro Four Thirds ( MFT ) camera have always been underestimated in the photography world due to their small sensor and heavyset form . They ’re often seen as more of a " founder " camera — our reviewer , Kimberley , had an Olympus Pen E - PL-8 which she loved — and MFT photographic camera are n’t always take seriously by serious hobbyists or professional photographers , until now .
We know a portion of very gifted and experienced photographers who are fully commute to MFT cameras , and after spending some meter with the OM-1 Mark II , we can see why .
We passionately disliked the inconvenient placement of the power toggle.
In this review , we ’ll be putting the OM-1 Mark II to the test to see how it perform for a range of photographic pursuit . We ’re peculiarly intrigued by itsStarry Sky AutofocusandLive Compositemodes — if they puzzle out as well as they claim , the OM-1 Mark II could terminate up being one of thebest astrophotography cameras . It ’s also capable of up to 120FPS , which is , candidly , insane , moot many of thebest cameras for wildlife photographycan ' only ' typically pip between 20 - 40FPS .
OM System OM-1 Mark II review
Design & comfort
The layout , weightiness and dimensions of the OM-1 Mark II are selfsame to its predecessor . The only design conflict is that the dial are now rubberized ( which is bang-up for cold night shoot when you ’re wearing gloves ) , and you’re able to now map the menu button to one of the button on the right - helping hand side of the body , keeping your left hand free to support the lens .
We found it comfortable to hold for tenacious flow and it has a unspoilt grip for any size deal . The only clock time it pay back too heavy and yield our reader a handwriting - cramp was when she paired it with theM.Zuiko ED 40 - 150 millimetre f/2.8 Pro(1.67 lbs/880 g ) to shoot a football ( association football ) match and left the mounting plate for her monopod at home ( completely her own shift , and also down to the weight of the lens , not the tv camera ) . All the other hand-held shoots , however , we had no consolation issues with .
It ’s also IP53 atmospheric condition - seal , which they claim is " built to surpass through snow dust and rain . " We did n’t really need to invite destiny by testing out whether this was true , though .
For a Micro Four Thirds camera, they haven’t skimped on the EVF and LCD resolution.
We really wish that some of the mode and controls already have their own designated buttons on the body ( specifically the drive and focus modes ) , although we wish some of the release were more pronounced . There are some we can make do with , but some of the buttons are more flush with the soundbox , make them knockout to press even with bare , gloveless fingers . We also would ’ve liked a third dial on the physical structure for ISO so we could adjust all three vulnerability setting severally . There is an ISO clit just next to the top dial which enables you to scroll through the ISO value with either the front or top dial , so it ’s a decent enough halfway theater between there being a third dial and having to dive into the carte to change the ISO . Still , we ’re not trusted why they did n’t just add another dial onto the back of the body in place of the up , down , leave and correct buttons .
Another design feature film we ’re not convinced by is the location of the on / off switch on the remaining side of the dead body ( a similar placement to the Canon EOS R5 ) . It just felt like a very inconvenient spot to have it when you see how you actually nurse a camera , and because it ’s not very easy accessible , it slows you down if you need to act quickly to turn the television camera on to get those ' blink and you ’ll miss it ' shots at a consequence ’s notice .
We much prefer the on / off on/off switch being on the right side of the consistence , like on the Sony and Nikon theoretical account , so you’re able to flick the electrical switch easy with your index while you ’ve got the camera up to your face . When it ’s on the remaining side of the body , your left helping hand has to move from stand the crystalline lens to flick the power electric switch , then back onto the lens again before elevate the camera up . It ’s only a small thing , and could just be a personal predilection , but we found it inconvenient enough to warrant compose an entire paragraph about it in this limited review .
We took the OM-1 Mark II to a flower field to test its color reproduction. (75mm, f/4, 1/2500, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Otherwise , we like that it has two card slots and think they were well send and easily approachable should you require to change cards mid - shoot — it ’s always annoying when the SD add-in slot is in with the battery , specially when you ’re shooting on a tripod . However , although the ports are easily accessible , we thought the pencil eraser fluttering were a niggling slight and could easily be accidentally broken or pulled off .
In regards to the menu organization , it ’s probably one of our favorites of all the camera we ’ve test . It ’s easy to navigate and well laid out , and we peculiarly like that there was a short account of what each setting and feature does , which is really ready to hand for tiro or anyone who is n’t technically minded or familiar with what sure things do .
Electronic viewfinder & LCD screen
The OM-1 Mark II has a 3 - inch fully phrase touchscreen with a 1,620,00 dot resolution . Although it ’s not the most detailed screen there is , it has the high resolution of any OM System / Olympus model to escort , and we thought it was bright , true to life with good color , and the trace presentation was antiphonal . Even in the wickedness , we were easily capable to see our ikon even in areas with substantial clear defilement .
The electronic viewfinder sit somewhere in the midriff equate to a lot of other popular models , with a 5,760,000 dot resolution . We notice it easy to track subjects through the viewfinder in various firing conditions , although we insure a tiny bit of rolling shutter when following a go subject field through the viewfinder ( but not enough to be distracting ) .
Image quality & dynamic range
A large part of icon caliber is down to the lens , but throughout our time with the OM-1 Mark II , we ’ve been unceasingly impress with the quality of the images we ’ve taken with several different lens system . It would n’t be fair to compare the OM-1 Mark II to some of the high - remnant professional full - frame cameras we ’ve reviewed , but for an MFT sensor , we think it surely holds its own .
The detector is " only " 20.4MP , which may be less than worthy for many shooter , however , the sensor is stack which give its overall performance an extra boost . And unless you ’re printing importantly large hoarding - sized prints , it ’s improbable the lower megapixel enumeration will actually make much of a conflict .
active compass was good , although , we noticed during a sundown shoot that if the sky was at all overexposed ( which is easy to do when pointing directly at the sunshine ) we struggled to get the details back in the highlight in post - processing . We used the multiple exposure ( bracketing ) characteristic to help egest this , but it ’s something to keep in mind if you often take to bank on bring details back in the highlights in Lightroom afterwards .
100mm, f/4, 1/640, ISO 100)(Image credit: Kimberley)
Autofocus & subject detection
The OM System OM-1 Mark II has six different subject sleuthing style — human beings ( faces and eye ) , cars and motorcycles , airplanes and helicopters , trains and locomotives , birds , and animals . We wanted to beguile as many different subjects as possible to see how well the tv camera could detect and lock the focal point on each feed subject .
First , we tested the human topic detection , and we have no complaints here . It was easily able-bodied to detect and cover our subject ’s face and eye , with the tv camera effortlessly switching to confront detection when she was wearing sunglasses . There were a few guesswork that missed slimly the more she move around , but overall we ’d blithely use the OM-1 Mark II for portrayal .
To take it a whole step further , we wanted to see how it would handle multiple faces at once , so we contract the tv camera to photograph a soccer equal . We were really impressed with how it tag multiple faces and move ingredient at the same time , although it sometimes sharpen on the awry human face or the back of a player ’s head when they ran between the player with the bollock and the photographic camera .
57mm, f/4, 1/1000, ISO 100(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
When it comes to wildlife photography , the OM-1 Mark II has wench mode and fauna mode . We took it to a nature second-stringer with theM.Zuiko Digital ED 100 - 400 mm F5.0 - 6.3 ISlens and overall , it coped very well . We determine some dragonflies sunbathing on a fence and it was able-bodied to pick up detail in their eyes and wings very well , although it struggled to figure out which part of their shape were the eye .
consider there are dedicate mode for airplanes and power train , we ’d have liked a separate mode for insect , but we snap different louse using bird mode and it deal fairly well , although sometimes the tv camera struggle to track such modest puppet in flight . When we used brute eye detective work on a duet of cats , it performed much better , accurately detecting and tracking their eye even in humble Inner Light .
We seek to photograph a passing commercial-grade airplane using airplane mode , but the camera just would n’t focus on it . But we swap to hoot modal value and it detected the sheet almost directly . Is it a dame ? Is it a airplane ? It ’s a bird , harmonise to the OM-1 Mark II .
100mm, f/1, 1/800, ISO 200(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Live Composite & low light performance
bouncy Composite score the OM-1 Mark II one of the good cameras for capturing star trails or light picture at night , as it enables you to see what the photograph look like in real - meter as the image is being immortalise , which is immeasurably helpful for shoot star trails . Once Live Composite is set , you may see the progress of the image on the LCD projection screen so you know to finish the shutter when you ’ve strain your desire effect . It then saves one single epitome as an ORF ( RAW ) file . While this is a very handy feature , particularly for users who only do the occasional chip of astro , more seasoned shooters who want more ascendence over their final double might want the option to save all the icon rather than compositing them into one file cabinet in - tv camera .
The area that allow the OM-1 Mark II down for us was general low - light shot that did n’t allow for a slow shutter speed . Though we will introduce this by enounce that the lens we used for these next exposure had an f/5 aperture , so you would likely yield better issue with a blanket aperture genus Lens attached . To test its randomness treatment , we hire some photos of cats on an overcast day outdoors and inside a dark family during the day .
We mark that ISO 3,200 look full and less noisy than the same ISO 3,200 did when taken inside , but unless you could afford to slow up the shutter hurry down for slow - moving or stationary depicted object at sunrise or dusk ( for wildlife picture taking ) , or you have a very wide lens , you may have difficultness with mellow ISO values on the OM-1 Mark II . We also found this to be the case when we photographed the evening football match . Even with the photoflood on , the images became quite noisy when we had to start increase the ISO .
Before & After of a single image with manual editing (17mm, f/7.1, 1/400, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Starry Sky AF
Another fantastic feature article for astrophotography is OM System ’s Starry Sky AF . We ’ve all spend hours out in the cold at night seek to get some great astro guessing , only to get home and let on that we missed the focus and all our shots are muzzy .
We ’ll intromit , we were very skeptical of Starry Sky AF before we try out it out . The first thing photographers are learn when use up photos of stars is the grandness of ace manual focus because cameras ca n’t detect the faint pinpoints of light way off in the distance . So an algorithm that can enable a camera to mechanically observe and focus on those vague stars almost has to be check to be consider .
For context of use , we occupy the above photo in a suburban back garden in a town that is Class 5 on the Bortle Scale , and there also happens to be a vivid streetlight right next to the house for in effect standard . Even in those circumstance , the OM-1 Mark II had no trouble at all focalize on the whizz . We also took it to shoot themilky wayover Glastonbury Tor , which is the same Bortle Class 5 but there was less immediate unaccented contamination directly around us
The same image, but three images were taken with Exposure Bracketing and stitched together to deal with the varying light levels in the scene. (17mm, f/5, 1/3200, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
To spark it , go into the Starry Sky AF set in the menu to choose your configurations . You need to pick out the AF Priority ( either speed or accuracy ) , the AF Operation ( take which button trigger it ) and the Release Priority ( determines whether the shutter can be free with or without exact focus ) . Then , when you ’re ready to film , you just go to your focus mode and select the Starry Sky AF mode , then press whichever push button you mapped it to ( we chose AF - ON ) . It ’ll start the Starry Sky AF for a few moment , then once it ’s done , you ’re quick to take the photograph . And that ’s all there is to it .
It ’s worth saying here that even though the high-pitched ISO performance was n’t much to shout about during the day , we have been endlessly impressed by its astro performance thanks to its noise reduction lineament when Night Vision mode is activate .
Live GND
A neat feature of speech for landscape painting photographers is the make - in Live GND ( Graduated Neutral Density ) . This permit you to consider and adjust a calibrate inert concentration filter effect on the touchscreen , decimate the need to carry filter around with you ( which is also a bonus if you have a mickle of lens system with different filter thread size ) .
There are three dissimilar speciality to choose from — GND 2 , 4 and 8 , and a choice between a flaccid , medium or hard effect for each . We found it to be nicely antiphonal on the touchscreen and we liked that it works in both landscape and portrait orientation , and you’re able to use the dials as well as the touchscreen to change the slant of the filter .
Burst rate, buffer & battery life
The barrage fire life of the OM-1 Mark II is , in our opinion , catastrophically underestimated in OM System ’s spectacles sheet . They claim you could photograph up to 500 photos from a single charge , but when we place on uninterrupted interval shooting and maxed out our 128 GB Coyote State card with 3699 shot , it only took the battery from 96 % down to 61 % . The caution here is that we were n’t ' using ' the tv camera as such ( changing preferences , following a subject around while the photographic camera was on , etc ) , and there was only 1 second in between shots . Regardless , we cerebrate that ’s quite an impressive assault and battery life sentence and we did n’t notice a substantial conflict in the stamp battery operation while we were hit a 90 - arcminute football compeer .
They also boast an unlimited recording fourth dimension for video . To test this , we started recording in 4 super acid 30p at 99 % battery where it stated 88 Fukien capacity . It begin blinking red-faced signal the barrage was about to fly the coop out at 2 hrs 27 Hokkianese ( where it state that it had 14 mins left on the card ) , and the electric battery died 5 minute afterward at 2 hrs 32 mins . The camera get warm after a short while ( for both stills and TV ) but did n’t overheat to the point of failure .
We were also very impressed with the cowcatcher . The ability to continue shooting while the photographic camera is clearing the buffer ( provided you are n’t maxing it out ) turn up endlessly utilitarian when you ’re shooting dissipated action or portraits without having to await for the buffer to exculpate — something that drives us up the wall about Sony camera . Plus , they ’ve more than replicate the buffer store capacity from 92 shots in the OM-1 to 213 shots ( at 120fps ) in birthday suit on the OM-1 Mark II .
It struggled to track small insects in flight, but the focus was spot on for this stationery insect on a flower. (100mm, f/4, 1/1250, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
It is deserving noting that while the ability to shoot blackout - innocent 120FPS is impressive on paper , and there may be incredibly recession circumstances where you might want to employ it , in the majority of case , 10 or 20FPS will do just ticket , and you wo n’t need to sort through G of identical frames in post . We ’ll include we were a tiny bit thwarted that you ca n’t hear the 120FPS shot as it basically just records footage like a video , but we may have been a bit optimistic there .
What’s new?
While there are some new and updated features in the OM-1 Mark II compared to its predecessor ( the original OM-1 ) , there ’s nowhere nearly as big of a jump as there was between the OM-1 and the modelling before that — the OM - D Mark III ( think of the OM-1 as the OM - D Mark IV , if you wish ) . We were blown aside by theOM System OM-1 when we reviewed itand give it a massive 5/5 whiz , but user who already own the OM-1 may notice that there are n’t enough Modern or worthwhile features to warrant upgrading to the OM-1 Mark II . However , some key differences between the OM-1 and the OM-1 Mark II may be the deciding factor to rock users who do n’t own either one .
Here are some of the primary differences between the two :
Verdict
What we liked:
What we didn’t like:
✅ You ’re a serious hobbyist : Pros would likely want something with a with child sensor and higher resolving , but for serious hobbyist who require an fantastically capable camera , the OM-1 Mark II is a fantastic choice. ✅ You’re a keen wildlife photographer : Thanks to its AI - power autofocus subject detection and insanely fast burst rate , it ’s a great option for wildlife picture taking .
❌ You already own the OM-1 : For a mickle of users , there wo n’t be enough upgrades from the previous model to warrant spending the special money on the OM-1 Mark II. ❌ You’re a beginner : That ’s not to say beginners would n’t get on with it , but it ’s likely going to be overkill for what father would need , plus it ’s one of OM System ’s more expensive models .
Having been absolutely spoilt by have the chance to review some of the best cameras on the marketplace , we aboveboard were n’t expecting to be all that impressed with the OM System OM-1 Mark II . But after thoroughly testing out and using all the feature film it propose , it has exceeded our expectations and we think it thoroughly deserves its spot at the top of their compass .
There’s no dedicated insect mode, but bird mode was capable of capturing a bumble bee collecting pollen. (70mm, f/4, 1/640, ISO 200).(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
There seems to be something in this camera for everyone , which ca n’t be pronounce for every example . Live Composite and Starry Sky AF make it howling for beginner astrophotography , Live GND and multiple photo bracketing benefit landscape photographers and the blisteringly fast burst rates and open detecting autofocus make it a large option for both sport / fast action and wildlife picture taking .
The gamy ISO image were a niggling noisy for our liking compared to other models we ’ve test , so we would n’t recommend it if low - abstemious portraits are your specialty where you need to maintain a somewhat rapid shutter speed .
It ’s absolutely suitable to serious and passionate hobbyists who want a powerful and subject motorcar without having to pass upwards of $ 3,000 on professional full - frame models . While a beginner would get on just fine with it in a practical sense ( for example , each setting has a forgetful account of what it does in the menu ) , it would belike be both too expensive and overkill for the motive of a beginner overall — unless you ’re well-chosen to jump in at the mysterious end and are confident you ’re going to continue the hobby .
Marley the ragdoll cat helped me test out the animal autofocus, which worked well. (123mm, f/5.6, 1/40, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
If the OM-1 Mark II isn’t for you
The OM-1 Mark II is undoubtedly an telling camera that stomach out in the MFT worldly concern , but it wo n’t be to everyone ’s mouthful .
Loyal full - frame shooters probably would n’t even look at it , and it could be overkill for absolute beginners with the amount of features it has . We also would n’t recommend it to anyone who just want a thick and lightweight photographic camera for travel .
Here are some alternative mathematical product we ’d urge :
Even when the model is wearing sunglasses, the OM-1 Mark II still maintains accurate autofocus. (28mm, f/10, 1/200, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Sony A7 IV
If you do a lot of astrophotography or gloomy light workplace but need to go down the full - figure itinerary or else of MFT , we think theSony A7 IVis one of thebest astrophotography camerasout there , thanks to its spectacular high ISO execution . Plus , it ’s only a duad hundred dollars more expensive than the OM-1 Mark II . Duringour Sony A7 IV follow-up , we could easily pullulate at ISO values up to ISO 10,000 and retrieve the dynamic ambit was superb .
canyon EOS R8
The OM-1 Mark II easily handled multiple moving faces in the frame at once — even an intrigued driver! (160mm, f/4, 1/1600, ISO 400)
If you ’re on a tighter budget and need a compact , lightweight full - frame camera that is perhaps more desirable for father , we ’d advocate the Canon EOS R8 . We think it ’s thebest lightweight camera for astrophotography , and duringour Canon EOS R8 revaluation , we think its compact size and light weight made it comfortable to hold for long period , constitute it one of thebest beginner cameras for wildlife photography , too .
Alternatively , theNikon Zfwould also be a good selection for beginners .
Olympus OM - D E - M10 Mark IV
Bird mode could accurately detect insects, although it struggled with eye detection. (307mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 800)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Beginners or casual shooters who do n’t want to go full frame would do really well with this belittled and compendious 20MP fashion model . It ’s a fantastic travel familiar with 4 thousand video , range stabilization and up to 15FPS uninterrupted shooting . This is also the same camera that Taylor Swift has recently been photograph using , and if it ’s unspoilt enough for her , it ’s good enough for us .
Nikon Z8
If you ’re a professional earning money in the industry , you ’ll need more mightiness and more resolving . If you have the money to pass , we think the Nikon Z8 is one of the skillful photographic camera on the marketplace , period . Sure , the OM-1 Mark II would be fine as a 2nd photographic camera body , but we find duringour Nikon Z8 reviewthat it has the image quality to make it one of thebest cameras for wildlife picture taking , and the low - lighter performance to be one of thebest astrophotography cameras .
(400mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 500)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
How we tested the OM-1 Mark II
Throughout our clock time with the OM System OM-1 Mark II , we desire to take advantage of as many of its feature as we could . Over the class of a few months , our reviewer took it to flower fields , shot a football ( association football ) game , snap cats and bees , shot astro in the back garden and more . To test its stamp battery life , we set it going on continuous interval shooting until it either run out of electric battery or fill up up the carte du jour , and we put ourselves in the shoes of various types of lensman to consider how it execute for various pursuit .
Best photographic camera for wildlife photographyBest astrophotography camerasBest telescopesBest binocularsBest binoculars for stargazingBest field glasses for kidsBest star projectorsBest ability banks
We used a variety of unlike lenses , include theM.Zuiko ED 17 mm f/1.2 Pro , theM.Zuiko ED 40 - 150 mm f/2.8 Prowith a 1.4x teleconverter and theM.Zuiko Digital ED 100 - 400 mm F5.0 - 6.3 IS . Our reviewer either shot handheld or used one of her Benro tripods — theRhino , Tortoiseor theMach3 .
(100mm, f/5, 1/1600, ISO 320)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Our reviewer , Kimberley , said : " When I ’m reviewing a camera I will equate them to other alike models I ’ve test and whether they perform upright , bad or the same , but I also line up it ’s crucial to weigh where each product seat in the mart and who each model is direct at . For instance , it would n’t be fair to equate the OM-1 Mark II with theSony A1 . So even though one tv camera will be jump and leap well , I always seek to form my feeling on each television camera for what it is in its own right field . I ’ll also never give a 5 - star evaluation to a product if I can witness something wrong with it aside from ' it ’s heavy ' or ' it ’s expensive . "
The constant surveillance of modern life could worsen our brain function in ways we do n’t full understand , disturbing studies suggest
figure of speech capturing a starving lion , fighting bison and quarry of vipers honored in environmental photography accolade
(314mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 1250)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
scientist clear major barricade in commission to build sinewy AI photonic chips
(138mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO 500)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
(227mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 400)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
(335mm, f/6.3, 1/3200, ISO 640)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Live Composite is a great feature for capturing star trails without needing to stack multiple images manually. (17mm, f/1.2, 10 sec interval shooting, ISO 640)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Using the LCD screen, you can see what your image looks like.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
There’s some noise at ISO 3,200 when used outside, but Lightroom denoise can easily clean it up. (100mm, f/5, 1/1000, ISO 3200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
However, ISO 3200 inside seems to show much more noticeable noise in the images. Nothing unfixable, but it might get annoying if you have a lot of images to clean up. (100mm, f/5, 1/1000, ISO 3200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
The Starry Sky AF feature on the OM-1 Mark II is unlike anything we’ve used before. (17mm, f/1.2, 13 sec, ISO 500)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
You need to activate it in order for it to work, but it’s not a complicated process.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
Starry Sky AF takes a bit of ‘know-how’ to get it working, but it was spot on every time. (17mm, f/1.2, 13 sec, ISO 640)
You can adjust the Graduated Neutral Density filter using the responsive touchscreen.
We took the OM-1 Mark II out for 8 hours of shooting, starting at 100% battery and ended up with 24%. (100mm, f/5, 1/1600, ISO 640)
The large buffer is great for wildlife shooting with fast burst rates.
Most of the changes have been on the inside, with the OM System OM-1 (left) and OM-1 Mark II (right) being identical in size, weight and button layout.
The OM-1 Mark II is very intuitive to shoot with, but there are a couple of tweaks we’d make.
The OM-1 Mark II could easily track birds in flight using bird mode. (400mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
(400mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
(400mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO 200)(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
We took the camera to a flower field and nature reserve to shoot some wildlife and portrait shots.(Image credit: Jase Parnell Brookes)
(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)
(Image credit: Jase Parnell-Brookes)
(Image credit: Jase Parnell Brookes)
