When you purchase through links on our site , we may earn an affiliate commission . Here ’s how it works .
Strange lights in the sky , little green men and crashed vessels secreted away to government labs — the comparatively modern chronicle of flying saucer is replete withconspiracy theoriesand allegations of coverups .
But beyond the endless argumentation between worshiper and debunkers over what could be behind the phenomena , the fact remain that many people have looked into the sky and reported take care things they can not explicate . So what do UFO reports order us about ourselves ?
An artist’s impression of UFOs appearing over a small town.
To discuss UFO sightings , how and why they first emerged , and the ways they attach into the ethnical and political trends of the past and present , Live Science spoke withGreg Eghigian , a professor of history and bioethics at Penn State University , whose raw Koran , " After The Flying Saucers Came " ( Oxford University insistence , 2024 ) , is one of the first societal story of UFOs , or unknown anomalous phenomena ( UAP ) . Here ’s what he had to say .
Ben Turner : A lot of people take UFOs entered public consciousness with theRoswell incident . But your book says otherwise . When did it all begin ?
Greg Eghigian : I retrieve when we face at this as a social phenomenon — not just simply someone saw something unusual in the sky , but that the target was made by somebody , and that one of the likely scenarios is they were extraterrestrials — we can mark the present moment that starts to develop in June 24 , 1947 .
The Roswell Daily Record, July 9, 1947.
The secret pilotKenneth Arnoldsees these objects [ that day ] over Washington state when he ’s fly his plane . He land and report it to the military and to journalist . When ask how they flew , he answered that these things take flight kind of like discus skip over across the water . Then , within a daylight or two , a diarist come up with this gravid headline : " Flying saucer . "
Once we had flying saucer , everything else fell into spot .
BT : But then Roswell happened just a few weeks after . How did a evenhandedly modest city in New Mexico become notable all over the world for UFO , while Arnold ’s name remains relatively unknown ?
The Roswell Daily Record, July 9, 1947.
GE : Here ’s the thing about Roswell that a mass of people do n’t clear . The story that come out of Roswell is that some material had been recollect around an Air Force base there that they believe could be from a crashed flying disk .
Within a day , the Air Force rolls that back , saying that it ’s not the case , the citizenry who first found it were mistaken . The reality is that the people who were on the basis and found this stuff were not terribly qualified to talk about it .
They did n’t understand what they had , literally , in their hands , and the people who normally dealt with the material were in reality off at a group discussion . When they did finally get a luck to look at it , they said , " Oh this is reasonably mundane stuff and nonsense , " and they corrected themselves .
The actor Orson Welles explains his radio broadcast of H.G. Wells' The War of the Worlds to reporters after a fake radio bulletin of an alien invasion within the production caused mass panic.
So the Roswell thing puzzle a lot of air play , a lot of global word coverage for about 24 to 48 hours , and then it melt . It ’s not really ever talked about , and leaves very petty imprint on the UFO world for decades .
It ’s then only in the belated 1970s that some ufologists ( and this is a very unwashed thing in the UFO world ) go back over the record , dig deeper into the fib and think that they ascertain all these contradictions in it . That ’s when Roswell became a focal item .
BT : look at the period of history where all of this kicked off , we have growing Cold War rivalry , the new experiential threat of nuclear weapons , McCarthyism , fear of communism and Soviet Russia . It seems like a meter that ’s good for paranoia and conspiracism . How much is all of the UFO stuff tied into that ?
Socorro Policeman Lonnie Zamora points at one of the rectangular depressions in a gully which he says were left by the landing gear of an egg-shaped flying object.
GE : Oh , it ’s very tied in . I make the dot in the record that I do n’t think the UFO phenomenon as we get it on it would exist without the Cold War . There are a variety of reason for that , but one of the often blank out aspects of this is World War II .
WWII and the Cold War bring a number of critical things to the table for how UFO narration were built . Firstly , you have big governments — big government and bounteous militaries . You look at the United States Union government in 1900 and it ’s not a big thing , it ’s not this monstrosity . By 1945 , the U.S. governance was a large bureaucracy with a prominent military .
Secondly , what WWII teach everybody was that this institution can have mysterious program that establish noteworthy technology , likethe nuclear bomb , as well as young sort of aeroplane such as jets . And of course , both conflicts also have a lot of undercover work .
Communion: A True Story by Whitley Strieber. The book is a telling of the supposed experiences of Strieber, whose experiences under hypnosis revealed links to alleged encounters with extraterrestrial beings.
So when the UFO phenomenon emerges , the initial thought of just about everybody is that it has to be one of these superpowers . This has to be somebody doing surveillance .
That ’s also a lot of the ways it ’s still spoken about today : Who ’s doing this ? Who ’s keeping it a secret ? What are their intention ? And could it harm us ? So it ’s very much a part of it , and it haunts the story of UFOs for decades .
BT : There are also interesting overture to the Kenneth Arnold moment in 1947 . One thing that winkle to bear in mind isOrson Welles ' 1938 radio broadcast of the " War of The Worlds , " which caused a people scare that aliens were actually invading . Why did flying saucers take off in 1947 and not earlier ?
The whistleblowers Ryan Graves, David Grusch, and David Fravor at a House Oversight Committee hearing at Capitol Hill 26, 2023 in Washington, D.C.. The three testified about their experience with possible UFO encounters and discussed a potential covert government program to study debris from crashed, non-human spacecraft.
GE : I think the game auto-changer is the atomic dud . That something could be invented that we had no idea about , that is just presented to the man , and has this enormous destructive superpower that could wipe out all of humanity almost in an instant .
When you ask why now , some hoi polloi will respond that alien visitors have always been here and we ’re just noticing them now . But the argument that ’s usually presented is that it ’s probably because they [ the aliens ] saw us blow up atomic bombs . This makes us adequate to of being conversed with , or a potential menace down the road .
BT : There ’s an appeal to a gamy power in it too , right ? In a time when religion is falling by the roadside , after all the repulsion of the past century , people were looking for something that could save us from ourselves .
Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan stands near the two “non-human” beings before a press conference, at the Camino Real hotel, in Mexico City, Mexico on Sept. 13, 2023. Lab tests later revealed that the ‘aliens’ were actually made from paper, glue, metal and human and animal bones.
GE : There are sure as shooting people who think exactly that . The number who position all of this out is the psychologist Carl Jung . In the late 1950s , he wrote one of the first , and still one of the best , scholarly books on the matter .
It make this logical argument that , real or not , what they [ UFOs ] present to people is this idea of salvation from something , at least that ’s the hope . By the early 1950s you see the commencement of UFO religious communities , almost all of them tied to the New Age Movement .
BT : Everything you ’ve said so far create this seem like a firmly mid-20th century American phenomenon . I squeal to having been fond to the History Channel ’s " Ancient Aliens " back in the twenty-four hours . Do sightings stretch across cultures and into the past , as they claim ? Or is that a post - hoc tale ?
GE : This is a question that people contend middling smartly . There ’s no question that people report ascertain foreign thing in the sky date back to ancient times . The most noted good example is belike meteorite . For a tenacious clock time the idea that rock’n’roll could fall from the sky seemed evidently absurd , until people find out the rationality is because there are a portion of rock in space .
The job with going backward in time and retrospectively looking at stuff and saying : " Aha ! Here ’s another example of a UFO , " is that it ’s deeply , deeply debatable from a historic standpoint .
Most of the prison term it require an unwitting , and sometimes outright careful misreading of document , artifacts or house painting . I ’ve look very good artistic creation historiographer , for illustration , mouth about painting and say : " Oh my gosh , these thing are clear flying saucers ! " When the objects they ’re refer to are physical object in a particular spiritual ritual , or serve as a very symbolic trope . So it ’s very , very difficult to do that stuff [ accurately ] .
BT : This extend to on the methodology in your book . You take an agnostic approach : You do n’t take news report at facial expression economic value , but neither do you discount them out of hand . How does one go about impartially assessing a UFO report ? That ’s going to seem like a weird concept to hoi polloi .
GE : Yeah it is strange to people , and I have a go at it a band of people who still do n’t like that I do that .
For me , as a historian , it ’s part the approximation that I do n’t feel qualified to adjudicate some of these matter . I conceive some of these thing have to be done by a meteorologist , a physicist , an uranologist or an engineer — someone who is far well qualified than I am to say what ’s potential and what ’s anomalous .
But the other part is that this is the way I get to the thing that most worry me , which are human being . I say in the instauration of the Holy Writ that UFO do n’t make history , hoi polloi make flying saucer make history . That really is the main compass point ; it ’s that I ’m concerned in the human part of that history .
As far as we jazz today , UFOs do n’t have a natural story , they have a human history . Everything about them is refer to our sensing of them , our hypothesis and our discussions about them . The societal fact of the UFO is very real , and it needs to be chronicled now . Whether these things also have a natural history I ’m going to leave up to the researchers who do that material for a living .
BT : When you influence through these paper , I ’m sure some of them on their airfoil are apparently bogus . But others come from hoi polloi , pilots for instance , who have no interest in UFOs and are address out at pregnant personal and professional cost . Have you come across any genuine headscratchers ?
GE : Yeah a spate of them can be , or at least certain elements of them .
Back in the 1950s , there was one face that the U.S. Air Force wait into that really set them back on their heels . These two seasoned civilian pilots for Eastern Airlines , sensible fellows , who see this very unusual object during a flight , they could even make out detail from it and it was like nothing they ’d seen before .
That ’s eerie and strange . They did n’t have any explanation for it and certainly had no call to make it up — they were n’t seeking fame and that was n’t a fourth dimension you could make any money off this stuff and nonsense .
Then there ’s the case of Lonnie Zamora in the 1960s , he was a constabulary officer in the American Southwest who quit his vehicle because he thought he see a crashed car . He sees this strange object with people in a kind of white uniform working around it . Then they flit off in it .
By everybody ’s assessment at the time , he was a mild mannered guy , very cool headed and with dead no interest in promotional material . He occur across as very sheepish in the tuner interview . That ’s another instance where you sit there and think it ’s unvoiced not to believe he saw something . Then you seek to descend up with explanations for what the theory could be .
BT : How do the reports develop over clip ? Do they interchange as the refinement wall them comes into astute direction ?
GE : Some thing do n’t exchange that much . The overwhelming bit of them are see patterns of luminance , eyeball or firmament of some kind thatmove in a unknown mode then hiss by with no speech sound . That remains relatively unaltered from the first . But masses also see cigar shaped things or trilateral . A fortune of these things are uncouth across the populace .
What has changed more dramatically over the years and over different orbit , has been the description of the resident of these vessel , the aliens themselves . Early on in the fifties and sixties , a very usual thing would have been to talk about seeing what come along to be robot — front like the Tin Man from the " Wizard of Oz . " We do n’t run to see robots any longer .
Another very common matter during the fifties and 1960s were what were dubbed , " fiddling men . " They were n’t really draw as green but small and usually gendered male person for some reasonableness . They typically stood at about 4 feet [ 1.2 meters ] , and in position like Malaysia , they were under 6 inches [ 15 centimeters ] tall . Another very common matter in their description was they were wearing old plunger suit .
Then you get to the seventies and 1980s , and there ’s a unquestionable zoological garden of creatures : things that look like louse ; in South America and [ in ] the Soviet Union enceinte hirsute creatures that look like a Bigfoot or a Sasquatch are in particular common .
The one we have come to fuck as " the Thomas Gray " is not all that vernacular until the publication of Whitley Strieber’s"Communion " bookin 1987 , from that stage the musical theme ofwhat an alien looks likereally crystallized .
BT : That ’s got to be one of the things debunkers point to : the fact that the culture is shaping what mass see makes it easier to call it a aggregative hallucination .
GE : Yeah , the debunkers look at it and do that . What debunkers would wish to do is to get even more concrete than that and say why somebody would see something at a particular prison term . They say there was a television show two workweek before someone ’s sighting . Then the soul comes back and says I never watched it , and they go back and forth .
I unwaveringly trust that the sensitive of all sorts play a plastic purpose form the way people think , talk about and even see thing . But from my stand , this is where I might deviate from the debunkers . I do n’t think that simply excuse things away . It just means that people are human beings , they are doing what we always do .
When something bechance to us that is really bizarre or unexplainable , it ’s not a surprise that what we tend to do is reverse to analogies and to metaphors . It helps us to say , " Well , this was a little like this . "
BT : These debate hold on up to the present day , but thing have changed a deal too . We ’re sitting at the tail end of our own UFO — or should I say UAP — undulation . And this time , after U.S. Navy footage of mysterious flying physical object was released in 2017 , we ’ve get wind a very different reaction from officials . There have beenSenate hearings , task force play set up , andNASA has even been rope in . What happened ? Is it because everyone in the U.S. government now also rise up on UFO lore ?
GE : A routine of thing have changed that have led to this becoming something seen as lawful to ask question about , and considered , even in donnish R-2 , to be respectable to discuss . One affair is the reality of novel surveillance and sensing element to detect surveillance . In the United States , Chinaand Russia there is an awareness of those engineering and , of path , a Keeping up with the Joneses posture about them .
The proliferation of drones is one thing . Drones are everywhere now . I was speak to a Swedish ufologist a few years ago and he said that the number of sightings that regard drones has skyrocketed .
On the extraterrestrial dimension , since the belated 1990s uranologist have find out thatexoplanetsare middling omnipresent . That introduces the idea that major planet are really all over the place , and that inhabitable planets are really reasonably probable . I think that ’s made it well-off to conceive of these things as possible . I ’ve heard debunkers say they conceive it ’s likely that there are extraterrestrial civilization out there , they just do n’t think they ’re visiting us .
You also have multitude who are actively involved in lobbying people to take this seriously . There ’s Robert Bigelow , the billionaire , who ’s funnel a destiny of money into this causal agency . lobbyist now have the spike of certain politician in America who see this as a valuable result to them in some ways .
I think you have to always be a picayune misanthropical about politicians — they tend to be very pragmatic , and the fact that they come to this subject does n’t needs mean they ’re concerned in UFOs , but in other things they can accomplish .
BT : What are politicians trying to achieve by embracing it ?
GE : I could believe of them using this as a way to say they ’re go to keep money away from the military because they ’re not being fair brokers about this .
The number one thing I keep hear over and over again , from people on these committees and those who are maybe less interested , is spending and classification . U.S. military privateness has been a with child precedency since at least WWII , sure since the Manhattan Project , and it ’s only increase over the years . Then 9/11 really reduplicate , triple down on that .
This make the UFO / UAP thing a great example for all these common people to say , " We ’ve pay off all these whistleblowers saying all this stuff is going on . We have n’t pick up anything about it . You ’re keeping this from us . It ’s all purportedly classify . So we want in . "
BT : One of the frustrating thing about covering these questions is that you get undertaking forces that are essentially military task forces . People get along out to sayall sort of spooky hooey , and when they ’re poke into further they say we ’ll separate you the residue behind shut room access , and no we wo n’t allow scientist into the bases where we saw this . Now thatNASA ’s involved , do you have more faith for civilian science projects to get to the bottom of things ?
GE : Yeah , distinguish on . I agree with you altogether . It ’s why I always tell people that , personally , I do n’t think these military intelligence branches will be primal to addressing these question . I do n’t retrieve you ’re ever going to get it from them . I ’m also not someone who believes in full transparency , sometimes it ’s significant to keep secrets .
NASA ’s endorsement of research in this area is unprecedented , and I think it ’s very welcome . I know a heap of scientist who have commence to seek to conduct inquiry along these lines . The job we have is it has not interpret into financial backing yet . A lot of the current efforts are on shoelace budget and it ’s unreadable whether that money is ever run low to be forthcoming . So far , at least in the United States , it has not been .
But there is a Leslie Townes Hope among a lot of researchers that that will convert , because the clime has commute . Civilian scientists and researcher are going to be the cay , because we function in a domain of transparency , with an openness that contractors and government activity do n’t have .
BT : Do you think we ’ll ever get a whole answer ?
GE : I mistrust we will be revisit and speculating over this for a good long time to add up . The world ’s been at this for over 75 year , and the most seasoned ufology veterans will tell you that not a plenty has changed .
If there is an chance for serious , empirically driven researchers to get involved , perhaps then we ’ll in reality come out to see some actual advance .
But until that time , it seems to me we ’re still stick in a hertz where we largely rely on rumor and reference to evidence that never turns up . Or , as you say , citizenry say I ’ve got some entropy , but I can only recite you behind closed doorway .
That just leaves us with the mystery , which I know some people are slaked with .
After the Flying Saucers Came : A ball-shaped chronicle of the UFO Phenomenon$15.99 on Amazon
If you enjoyed this interview with Greg Eghigian , you may read more about the history of UFO sighting in his newfangled book , " After the Flying Saucers Came . " It ’s a fascinating score of the spheric cultural phenomenon .
Did the James Webb telescope really find evidence of alien life ? Here ’s the truth about exoplanet K2 - 18b .
Dyson spheres could really exist — but there ’s a catch
Could a planet really develop a brain ?
