One of the most surprising aspectsof the newiPhone 16eis its lack of MagSafe . MagSafe is an Apple - created tech that ’s so good that the Wireless Power Consortium adopted it asthe basis of theQi2 wireless charging standardused by non - Apple machine . But it ’s not on the iPhone 16e , and that ’s by innovation .
In his review of the iPhone 16e , John Gruberstatesthat the phone ’s target area interview does n’t care about MagSafe , accord to Apple representatives he spoke to . Users of the 16e “ exclusively ” consign through a overseas telegram , and if they did expend inducive charging , they do n’t care that the 16e is limited to the slower 7.5W Qi charging speed . For equivalence , the iPhone 16 and 16 Pro have MagSafe that buck at 25W if you apply a 30W or higher adaptor , and they have the magnet that the 16e does n’t have to ensure a proper connection .
Whether that ’s true or not , MagSafe still feels like an queer feature to omit . MagSafe is a marquise Apple feature , not only because it offer convenient , quick charging , but also because the magnets involved offer non - charging functionality . For example , I employ a auto mount that holds my iPhone 16 using the MagSafe magnets . I ca n’t apply the iPhone 16e with my riding horse .
Apple ’s reasoning sounds like marketing rationalization . We know that MagSafedoesn’t interferewith Apple ’s newC1 modemas was speculated , and MagSafe probably does n’t cost that much for Apple to go through . What is clear is that if MagSafe is a primal gene in your purchasing decision , you have to step up from the iPhone 16e to the iPhone 16 or 16 Pro – which might be the real reason why Apple left it out .
If you want an iPhone 16e with MagSafe , you canadd a MagSafe case , but you ’ll still only get 7.5W charging speeds . Learn more about theiPhone 16e , thedifferences between the iPhone 16e and the iPhone SE it supplant , the5 things Apple killedto make room for the iPhone 16e , and thedetails on MagSafe .
Apple iPhone 16e
