Expert’s Rating
Pros
Our Verdict
This is a fine charger with a dissimilar take on port locating that will please those for whom technology ’s encroachment on a home or workplace environment is important .
Price When review
This time value will show the geolocated pricing text for production undefined
Best Pricing Today
Best Prices Today: Anker 140W 4-Port PD 3.1 Charger
USB - C bulwark chargers get modest and cuter every year , but bond a cable television in one and it becomes an eyesore thrusting out at the diametric end to the wall .
Anker makes a lot of those mini and some less mini chargers , but its tardy origination bucks the surly - sticky - out - cable trend by elegantly turn up the ports on the underside of the charger .
The Anker 140W 4 - Port PD 3.1 Charger lack a attention-getting name but solves the battery charger - cable artistic challenge with its close configuration .
Simon Jary / Foundry
Ports
The four underside ports are as follows :
Each of the 140W USB - C porthole could be used to fast - charge even the top - end 16 - inch Apple MacBook Pro and are shop at PD 3.1 .
As the maximum yield is 140W you ca n’t shoot two at the same meter at that rate . take note that the maximum yield boil down to 134W when charge four devices . utilise all four port at the same metre , and you could get 65W from one of the PD 3.1 port and 45W from the other , plus 12W from the continue USB - atomic number 6 embrasure and 12W from the USB - A.
That ’s enough for a MacBook Pro , a MacBook Air or iPhone , and a twosome more scurvy - power devices .
See how it compare to other options in ourBest iPhone Chargersand theBest USB - C charger for your MacBook .
Used on its own , the legacy USB - A port proffer an impressive 33W. While the electric power is theoretically enough to fast - direction an iPhone , Apple take a firm stand you use a 20W+ ( we ’d recommend 30W+ ) USB - C charging porthole .
Design
The underside fix of the ports is apt , although a little fiddlier to insert while the battery charger is connected vertically to the power socket .
If your power socket is on a desk rather than a wall , the ports are situated on one side and therefore do n’t stick out from the top like most chargers . This again is more pleasing to the middle .
Anker
Built using Gallium nitride ( GaN ) semiconductor material , the charger is small for a four - porthole model , although not as dinky as a one - port tiddler . It ’s uncommitted in either ash gray or gray-haired , and both the U.S. and U.K. models sport foldaway plug prongs .
The Anker ’s close-fitting rival would be theUgreen Nexode Pro 160W 4 - interface GaN Charger , with port at the traditional end .
The Ugreen charger measures 2.76 x 2.76 x 1.3 inches ( 7 x 7 x 3.3 curium ) and count 10.7 ounces ( 303 universal gravitational constant ) . The Anker is very slightly belittled but a tad wider at 2.72 x 2.72 x 1.42 inch ( 6.9 x 6.9 x 3.6 cm ) and weighs less at 9.7 oz ( 275 g ) . The U.K. poser is wider due to the larger prongs and therefore a niggling heavier at 10.4 oz ( 295 gramme ) .
There ’s footling in it , and the Ugreen charger can push out 160W instead of 140W , plus yield 65W from two of its porthole at the same time , pull up stakes 15W to share between the remaining two .
The Ugreen charger does n’t have a smart colour display like the Anker ’s , which shows provide a elaborate view of the turn on condition , temperature and larboard details .
Price
The Anker 140W 4 - Port ( PD 3.1 ) Charger is price at$89.99/£89.99and is also available onAmazonandAmazon U.K. The rival 160W Ugreen Nexode Pro costs $ 119.99 / £ 99 , so the Anker wins on price .
Should you buy the Anker 140W 4-Port (PD 3.1) Charger?
opt between the Anker 4 - port wine 140W Charger and Ugreen 160W Nexode Pro will come down to your desire for the other than placed interface and maybe the smart display , unless the dual 65W charging is a more potent pull .
Once you see the Anker ’s elegant port configuration it ’s almost upsetting to see battery charger with larboard sticking out at one oddment . To be fair , the old port placement is easier to use if you are more ofttimes connecting and disconnect , but if you leave the line in place for most of the clip it is an undeniably more aesthetic charging solution .
