Adobe Acrobat is arguably the most democratic grouchy - platformPDF editor program , offer the free Adobe Reader and ante up Acrobat Standard and Pro program for papers manipulation . With Big technical school normalizing chatting with your email , document , and tasks , Adobe naturally hopped on the trend and bake an AI assistant into Acrobat . The pay ADHD - on Acrobat AI Assistant enables you to dissect PDF files , summarize contract , postulate questions , and more . Given that ChatGPT can do similar undertaking , we tested Adobe ’s new AI integrating to see if it ’s worth the recurring fees .
Pricing and availability
Adobe ’s AI is integrated into theAcrobat app ( register our review)and available on peregrine , desktop , and the World Wide Web . While I could n’t personally get the AI window to debase in the native macOS client , the feature film act dependably on the web app . Whether you ’re using the make up or the free variation of Acrobat , get at the AI perquisite requires a disjoined subscription that costs $ 6.99/£6.98 on a month - to - month basis or $ 4.99/£4.98 a month ( $ 59.88/£58.90 ) when signing up for a full year of service . Get Acrobal AI Assistant here .
Adobe Acrobat
Putting Acrobat’s AI to the test
According to an Adobesupport document , the AI supporter in Acrobat is powered by the GPT-4o model . So , in possibility , its performance should be comparable to that of ChatGPT . Both chatbots warn about possible errors and urge you to double - stoppage sensible details .
Foundry
One of Adobe Acrobat AI ’s key features is contract analysis , which automatically extracts the important piece — such as the salary , certificate of indebtedness , relevant dates , etc . I test the tool with several contract , and it displayed the needed selective information right . It even highlights the missing contingent you ’d typically find in a contract , such as the early termination fee , liability , and audit rights . So , not only does it neatly summarize the document ’s content , but it also sheds lightness on abstracted bits you may need to enquire about before sign the contract .
What I specially sleep with about Adobe Acrobat AI is the citations next to each bullet point in the sum-up . These link to the original source in the text file , letting you well leap to a specific detail ’s position and check off its circumstance .
Another handy perquisite is the automatic follow - up questions that dynamically accommodate to each contract bridge . or else of manually type your question , you may simply select one of the relevant questions suggested by the chatbot . This enables you to ask about the elaborate debt instrument , for exemplar , without needing to formulate the enquiry on your own . You also get to ask it custom interrogation if the mechanically mother one do n’t accost your concern .
In plus to determine more about the analyzed contract , Acrobat ’s AI can generate emails base on the written document ’s data . This makes respond to the other party simpler and more efficient .
How ChatGPT compares
Whether you upload a PDF file to ChatGPT or immediately glue the contract ’s text , the chatbot can engender key spot in a comparable fashion to Acrobat AT . Notably , the reaction does n’t include the specialised feature film that Acrobat offers , such as citations and follow - up interrogative sentence , so you ’d have to manually search for relevant item in the original papers and compose inquiry from scratch to have similar answers .
What stands out to me is how quick ChatGPT is at providing answers . In contrast , Acrobat ’s AI “ thinks ” for a twosome of seconds before responding , but it excels in document analysis timbre . Adobe notes that it does n’t train its procreative AI models on customer data and “ prohibits third - party LLMs from education on Adobe customer data . ” It ’s less clear how ChatGPT uses the same information .
Is Adobe’s AI assistant subscription worth it?
If you professionally have to consider with multiple contracts a hebdomad , then Adobe Acrobat ’s AI may be deserving the recurring fee . The chatbot is specifically plan to analyse documents and offers worthful insights when it notice a contract bridge . You do n’t have to programme or learn it what to do .
Otherwise , if you ’re only handling a few contract bridge every once in a while , then ChatGPT — whether you ante up for it or not — is probably sufficient . In this case , you ’d need to do the hard lifting by manually guiding it , and you ’d still pretermit out on citations . You may find customs GPTs in the app that are better optimized for contract depth psychology .
at last , Adobe offers a more commodious experience but at a price , while ChatGPT provide broader public utility without necessarily be you a dime . If you ’re still unsure which chatbot to use for document analysis , you could try Adobe Acrobat ’s AI for free and decide once the tryout perish .
