Expert’s Rating
Pros
Cons
Our Verdict
The new entry - level iMac is interesting because it means the whole iMac cooking stove now starts at £ 899 , £ 250 less than the entry - level for 2013 ’s range . If you are buying based on price , this is a good price for an iMac , however , it ’s not the best small - price Mac you may grease one’s palms . If you want a cheap Mac aspect at the MacBook Air , if you are set on a iMac , devote £ 200 more and include the Fusion Drive with this model .
Apple has updated its scope of iMacs for 2014 , scale down prices across the cooking stove and also introduce a fresh low-spirited - price modeling that costs £ 899 , but is significantly slower than last class ’s launching - floor iMac . Read on for our lab trial of the new budget iMac .
In this review we will also be comparing the new 2014 £ 899 iMac with other similarly priced and speced Macs , including theMacBook Air , theMac Mini , and the previous entry - leveliMacfrom 2013 ( which is still available now for £ 1,049 ) .
We also volunteer the followingiMac reviews
Not sure which Mac to grease one’s palms ? Read ourBest Mac emptor guide
Also read : iMac versus Mac miniskirt
Budget iMac – how much does the new 2014 iMac cost?
The rumours were true – Apple has indeed plunge a new entry - leveliMac . you could now get an iMac for £ 899 , where previously the entry - level iMac be £ 1,149 . That ’s a saving of £ 250 .
Back in 2009 the entry - level 20 in iMac cost £ 782 , and there was also a 20 in £ 929 model , so this is n’t the cheapest ever iMac , however , it is the cheapest iMac for a few eld .
As for whether it ’s worth £ 899 , that depends . It ’s right that there is a low cost alternative for the iMac mountain range , but it ’s a mellow price to make up for what is essentially a very low spec simple machine , as you will see if you read on .
The obvious comparison is with theMacBook Air , which offers a similar spec at a similar price . you’re able to learn our comparison of the two model below . However , we will commence by look at how the fresh 1.4GHz iMac compares with the 2013 entry - layer iMac . A fresh iMac may be set up to launch this summer .
take aboutthe 2015 iMac release date here , plus there ’s a new Retina iMac that ’s even cheaper than the original , read our preview here:3.3GHz Retina iMac inspection
2014 entry-level iMac versus 2013 entry-level iMac
This year’sentry - level iMacis a altogether newfangled mode . Rather than fell the price on last year ’s £ 1,149 21.5 in simulation , which offered a 2.7GHz quad - pith Intel Core i5 , 8 GB RAM , 1 TB hard ride and Intel Iris Pro art ; this yr ’s lowest cost option offer 1.4GHz , 8 GB RAM , 500 GB grueling drive , and Intel HD Graphics 5000 , for £ 899 .
Those specs are more comparable to the MacBook Air as you will see below . It is very much an entranceway - level model remindful of Apple ’s eMac which was contrive for education and discontinued some years ago .
It seem that to arrive at the new lower priced iMac Apple has made a number of trade - offs , as you will see as we take a airless feeling at the eyeglasses of the automobile and reveal our test ensue below .
iMac or Mac miniskirt – Mac desktops compare
iMac versus MacBook Air
New 2014 iMac spec – how much slower is the new £899 model?
How does the specification of the new iMac line up comparability to the 2013 iMac model ? And specifically , just how much slower than the 2013 entry - level iMac than the next example up in the image ?
Macworld Labs has tested the new entry - stage iMac and compare it to 2013 ’s entering - point model ( now available for £ 1,049 ) . The unexampled 21.5 in 1.4GHz iMac scored 116 in our Speedmark 9 tests . Last year ’s 2.7GHz iMac scored 179 . This means that last class ’s entry - level iMac has a sexual conquest that is 54 % gamey than this year ’s entry - layer iMac .
If you try out the specs show up below it is n’t surprising that the newfangled model is slower , but it is significantly slower than what was previously the entryway - level role model , which Apple sold for £ 1,149 until it recently reduced the price .
It ’s worth keeping an optic onApple ’s refurbished storefor deals on the 2013 manakin . For exemplar , you may currently beak up a refurbished 21.5 - inch iMac 2.9GHz space - heart and soul Intel Core i5 from September 2013 for £ 999 ( if you grease one’s palms it Modern that exemplar be £ 1,199 ) .
How does the new budget iMac compare to the 2.7GHz entry-level model from 2013?
With the new £ 899 iMac Apple has made some terms - versus - power choice . As we said above , the new entry - level iMac has more in vulgar with the MacBook Air range than the premature entry - level iMac .
The 2013 ledger entry - layer iMac sport the same 21.5 in screen , but it boast a 2.7GHz quadriceps femoris - core Intel Core i5 , 8 GB RAM , 1 TB hard private road ; Intel Iris Pro graphics . And when it launched it cost £ 250 more at £ 1,149 . However , now it has had a price dip you’re able to bribe it for £ 1,049 .
By equivalence , the new 2014 entry - level iMac offers a 21.5 in screen but a slower , 1.4GHz dual - core Intel Core i5 , the same 8 GB RAM , a smaller 500 TB hard drive ; and slower Intel HD Graphics 5000 . It costs £ 150 less at £ 899 .
The upgrade option on the new £ 899 iMac are also pretty much non existent when compared with the rest of the range . There is no incremental central processor upgrade , no art kick upstairs and no RAM upgrades available ( indeed it is impossible to upgrade the RAM because Apple is using LPDDR3 RAM that is soldered on to the motherboard ) .
The other iMacs in the line can be elevate to 16 GB at the fourth dimension of leverage . RAM in these Macs is n’t prosperous to update yourself but it can be done .
However , you could choose to let in a 1 TB Fusion Drive when you purchase this iMac from Apple . As you will see from ourreview of the budget iMac with Fusion Drivewe urge that you do this as the SSD drive makes a important advance to the machine that warrants the supererogatory £ 200 ( full price £ 1,099 ) , indeed we would recommend doing this over buy the 2.7GHz iMac at £ 1,049 .
As you could see from our terrace mark resolution , there is a broad performance gap between the grim - ending iMac of 2014 and last year ’s entry - level model .
Read :
How does the new range of iMacs compare to 2013’s line up?
If you ignore the new tote up entry - stage iMac , there is little remainder in the spectacles of the new machine compared to the rest of the range – which are last year ’s models . The actual modification seems to be the price , which is as much as £ 150 less for the 27 in models . Read ourreview of the balance of the 2014 iMac range . Read on to liken the spec of the new and old machine .
The 2013 iMac line up was as follows:
The 2014 iMac line up is as follows:
2014 iMac versus 2014 MacBook Air
This raw low toll iMac costs £ 150 more than the entry - level 11inMacBook Airand is the same monetary value as the other 11 in MacBook Air . The iMac and MacBook Airs have comparable feature at comparable monetary value , so these simulation are call out for comparing .
Both Macs offer a 1.4GHz dual - core Intel Core i5 processor and Intel ’s HD Graphics 5000 graphics chip .
However the iMac volunteer 8 GB memory rather than the 4 GB declare oneself as banner in the MacBook Air , and the iMac offers a 500 GB toilsome drive , as opposed to the 128 GB SSD flash driving in the £ 749 MacBook Air , or the 256 GB SSD in the £ 899 MacBook Air .
Macworld Labs has tested the £ 899 iMac and the £ 899 MacBook Air . In our Speedmark 9 tests the 1.4GHz MacBook Air scored 139 , equate to the 116 score of the iMac . This indicate that the MacBook Air is a faster machine , as well as costing the same , or £ 150 less at £ 749 depending on which model you choose .
It is potential that the principal ground the MacBook Air is faster is its SSD drive ( photoflash memory is faster than a stock hard drive ) . Indeed , when we lend a 1 TB Fusion Drive ( which combines a hard drive with an SSD and cost an additional £ 200 as a build to order selection ) to the new 1.4GHz iMac it do a score of 143 .
Flash copies lodge quicker than a toilsome drive , hence we saw the 500 GB hard drive in the 1.4GHz iMac take 151 arcsecond to replicate a 6 GB set of files and folders compare to the Fusion Drive which finished the same task in just 41 endorsement . Similarly , unzipping a compress version of this data set took over three minutes with the 500 GB unvoiced movement , but just 67 second with the Fusion Drive in the CTO arrangement . Even with the boost of the Fusion Drive the iMac is still decelerate by its 1.4GHz processor .
The key remainder between the MacBook Air and the unexampled entry - level iMac , other than portability , is the storage available . Either you choose for a slower 500 GB tough drive , or you may get 128 GB of flash storage and a truehearted system overall . For the same price of £ 899 you could get a 256 GB flash thrust in your MacBook Air . We ’d happily pay for an external hard thrust for extra storage and use flash store on a daily basis for the speed boost .
RAM is the other big difference . The new entry - level iMac comes with 8 GB RAM as standard . This is not upgradable , not even at point of purchase , as it is soldered on . The MacBook Air comes with 4 GB RAM as standard , but this can be upgraded to 8 GB for an additional £ 80 ( and we always recommend bring more RAM ) .
In some tests the iMac with its 8 GB Aries was slightly faster than the MacBook Air with 4 GB RAM . For illustration , in graphics tests the £ 899 iMac post figure charge per unit between 11 and 15 percentage higher than the MacBook Air . The fresh iMac was also firm than the MacBook Air in the iMovie test . Overall , however , the new low - end iMac was 17 percent wearisome than the MacBook Air .
record our review of the 2014 11 in MacBook Air and 2014 13 in MacBook Air .
Budget iMac specs: processor
The 1.4GHz Intel Core i5 processor is the same one as you will find in the 11 in MacBook Air . It is therefore not surprising that the two machines returned similar resolution in our Geekbench 3 tests .
The iMac was , however , a fraction faster , with the MacBook Air store 2838 points for a single gist and 5464 points for multi - core operation , while the 11 - column inch MacBook Air score 2762 and 5392 point respectively , give the iMac very slight advantage of around 2 percent .
In our Cinebench R11.5 tests we also envision exactly the same score from the MacBook and budget iMac . Both car return returning 1.13 and 2.58 points respectively .
Budget iMac specs: storage
The unveiling - level iMac comes with a 500 GB hard drive , this is a slow hard drive track down at 5400 - rpm that would commonly be destine for a laptop computer . The other 21.5 in iMacs also boast 5400 rpm drive while the 27 in models offer debauched 7200 - rpm drives .
All iMacs ship as standard with backbreaking effort not SSD newsflash drives . This is a component that works against the iMac as a whole , as a SSD will speed up the machine well . Luckily there are upgrade options useable at point of sale .
With the SSD part of the Fusion Drive fit iMac the results for these same tests were : 11 minute ; 1 minutes 38 mo ; and 57 seconds severally .
register about how establish a Fusion Drive in this iMac for an supererogatory £ 200 will improve the speed of the machine .
Budget iMac specs: graphics
Where the 2013 entry - level fashion model , now uncommitted for £ 1,049 feature an Iris Pro , also have sex as the Intel HD Graphics 5200 graphics processor – the same as that fit out to the entree - level 15 - inch MacBook Pro with Retina exhibit . The Modern low - terms iMac ships with the same Intel HD Graphics 5000 graphics card that features in the current MacBook Air line up .
In our graphics tests ( using the OpenGL section of Cinebench R11.5 ) of both the MacBook Air and entering - level iMac , we fancy the latter pulling ahead slenderly – 21.7 Federal Protective Service against the MacBook Air ’s 18.5 fps .
If you are a game histrion this is not the Mac for you . We test usingTomb RaiderandBatman Arkham Cityand in both case game drama was hapless due to skeleton rate limitations . run Tomb Raider at decreased ‘ 1280 x 960’-pixel resolution and downhearted detail we saw a just - playable average form rate of 29 fps , for example . In fact Feral warn us that this iMac does not cope with minimum essential for the plot .
Budget iMac specs: screen
If you own an elderly iMac with a glossy cover then upgrading to a new iMac will at least rid you of that job . The current image of iMacs are a lot less reflective than older model .
We tested using a Datacolor Spyder4Elite and encounter that the covert hit 100 percent coverage figure of the industry - received sRGB colouring gamut , and up to 80 per cent of the Adobe RGB gamut . Colour calibration and color accuracy were also good .
2014 iMac specs: ports
Like the rest of the range , the new iMac offers the be ports :
What configuration options will be available for the new £899 iMac
Apple offers various soma to rate options that you could add at the time of leverage . It is wise to do so , because it is seldom easy to promote a Mac after this sentence and doing so is likely to void your warranty .
However , as we mentioned above , the build - to - order ( BTO ) options on the young incoming - level iMac for 2014 are limited compare with the residuum of the range . We do commend the Fusion Drive for an special £ 200 .
BTO options for the 2014 entry-level iMac:
There is no opportunity to tot up more RAM or alter the central processing unit in this model . Indeed , it is impossible to upgrade or change the RAM in the newfangled submission - level iMac as the 8 GB RAM that come as measure is soldered on .
BTO options for top of the range 2014 iMac:
By comparison , if you were to depend at the top of the range iMac in 2014 you could add the follow body-build - to - edict selection :
2014 budget iMac versus the Mac mini
Another Mac that solicit for comparison with the newfangled entry - story iMac is the Mac mini .
The Mac miniskirt still has n’t been updated – it was last upgraded in October 2012 leading some to suppose that it is go to eventually be quit .
The price of theMac miniwas reduced in Europe when the new iMacs went on cut-rate sale , but the entry - level Mac mini still retails at £ 499 in the UK . This is still £ 400 less than the entry - stratum iMac , but the iMac does admit a screen , mouse , keyboard , and a ranking processor and art .
When we benchmarked the almost two twelvemonth honest-to-goodness 2.3GHz Quad - Core Mac mini it scored 149 points – compared to the 116 stage of the newfangled entry - point iMac .
We expect that Apple willupdate the Mac mini soonand when it does ( if it does ) this raw iMac will really look hard done by .
Read ourreview of the 2012 Mac miniskirt here .
Where is the Retina display iMac?
There arerumours that Apple will launch a Retina show iMacat some point this year . The company has not yet launched this model – probably because of the graphics capability that would be required to power such a display .
you may lend another display to an iMac by plug away in the 2nd show using the Thunderbolt porthole .
Is the entry-level, £899 iMac good enough?
You do n’t need the horsepower of a high - end Mac to surf the internet , run power software , ship electronic mail , or take tutelage of other everyday computing machine chores . It is likely that the majority of consumers do n’t really need to gift in the late PCIe - join flash storage , quad - core i7 central processor , and distinct GPUs capable of hold up 4 grand video . It is these budget - apt consumers that Apple has in mind with its latest , lower - priced iMac .
The big question is whether a 15 pct small price is worth 50 percentage lower carrying out ? If you are just looking for a beautiful machine for browsing the web , send email , and running the most pop applications , as well as offering integrating with Io machine , then this Mac could be a smashing buy .
You could pay £ 150 more and get a decent iMac with a 2.7GHz quad - Congress of Racial Equality processor and 1 TB grueling drive , but if you have that hard cash to space , why not tot another £ 50 and pay £ 200 more for a Fusion Drive .
